<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Propping up the house of cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datanomic.com/dqview-blog/propping-up-the-house-of-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datanomic.com/dqview-blog/propping-up-the-house-of-cards/</link>
	<description>Enterprise Data Quality Management Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:54:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.datanomic.com/dqview-blog/propping-up-the-house-of-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datanomic.com/?p=341#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Nice post Steve,

It’s interesting that in a recent interview with DQ expert Tom Redman (www.dataqualitypro.com/tom-redman-interview), he voiced the opinion that Sarbanes Oxley has failed and I have to agree.

I do question how much the credit crunch is down to poor DQ. I think competitive practices and lack of regulatory control from the government are probably bigger issues but I also agree that there needs to be far more transparency and visibility that DQ can afford, as Tom mentions in the same article, banks simply don’t trust each others statements.

I remember 3 years ago a close friend of mine who had been made bankrupt in the past, defaulted on his previous mortgage 5 times and was then granted a self-cert mortgage for x4 times his salary. He’s struggling to keep afloat today.

I remember thinking at the time, this kind of practice is going to have ramifications down the line, and it clearly has. Millions of these mortgages have been sold in a competitive frenzy with companies hedging their bets that the economy would remain stable.

The thing is, the mortgage company knew all about my friends history. They knew he was a bad risk yet they still made that decision because of the market forces. I feel that is the type of situation we need to prevent in the future, DQ can help but if a company flies in the face of it then there is little we can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Steve,</p>
<p>It’s interesting that in a recent interview with DQ expert Tom Redman (www.dataqualitypro.com/tom-redman-interview), he voiced the opinion that Sarbanes Oxley has failed and I have to agree.</p>
<p>I do question how much the credit crunch is down to poor DQ. I think competitive practices and lack of regulatory control from the government are probably bigger issues but I also agree that there needs to be far more transparency and visibility that DQ can afford, as Tom mentions in the same article, banks simply don’t trust each others statements.</p>
<p>I remember 3 years ago a close friend of mine who had been made bankrupt in the past, defaulted on his previous mortgage 5 times and was then granted a self-cert mortgage for x4 times his salary. He’s struggling to keep afloat today.</p>
<p>I remember thinking at the time, this kind of practice is going to have ramifications down the line, and it clearly has. Millions of these mortgages have been sold in a competitive frenzy with companies hedging their bets that the economy would remain stable.</p>
<p>The thing is, the mortgage company knew all about my friends history. They knew he was a bad risk yet they still made that decision because of the market forces. I feel that is the type of situation we need to prevent in the future, DQ can help but if a company flies in the face of it then there is little we can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra P</title>
		<link>http://www.datanomic.com/dqview-blog/propping-up-the-house-of-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datanomic.com/?p=341#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I don’t think that data quality is the answer to all of the banks’ current woes, Steve, but I’m sure you have a point. I’ve been involved in a number of Basel II data warehouse implementations and they could all have benefitted from having better information going in to them. The clients never saw it as a priority at the time and I’m sure some of them will be rueing that decision now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think that data quality is the answer to all of the banks’ current woes, Steve, but I’m sure you have a point. I’ve been involved in a number of Basel II data warehouse implementations and they could all have benefitted from having better information going in to them. The clients never saw it as a priority at the time and I’m sure some of them will be rueing that decision now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
